Academic development, institutionalization, and collaboration with stakeholders need to be implemented in academic programs in coherent ways. A key insight from this article is that the academic educational system, which is largely not designed to train students to become agents and innovators for social change, requires fundamental reforms rather than incremental adjustments in order to seize the full potential of sustainability science. The integration of education, research, and contributions

to society will be of particular importance in transforming higher educational institutions for selleck kinase inhibitor sustainability. Finally, the article by van der Leeuw et al. (2012) takes a critical and provocative view at academia in its attempt to become

this website relevant in sustainability efforts. The diagnosis is deflating: anachronistic pedagogy, mismatched incentives, and insular products and communications that leave academic institutions poorly positioned to contribute significantly to solving Selleck Momelotinib sustainability problems. The paper points out that rhetoric still outweighs contributions to real-world sustainability transitions, while acknowledging that sustainability science offers new inclusive methods of research and practices involving relevant communities throughout problem-solving processes in meaningful ways. Innovations and reforms in academia need to cut deep and be fast

in order to successfully and sustainably compete against the ever-accelerating destruction of societies and environments. Sustainability science holds a promise—to children and future generations, to marginalized and disenfranchised groups, to the environment (beyond materials and energy fluxes). But as Phospholipase D1 the first decade of its inauguration comes to a closure (Kates et al. 2001), it is time to honestly and critically review the achievements and failures in sustainability science: where do we stand in fulfilling this promise, and are we trying hard and smart enough? This Special Issue pays particular attention to the link between science and society in sustainability efforts and indicates some accomplishments. Yet, it mainly suggests that current sustainability science efforts do not sufficiently engage with the affected and responsible stakeholder groups, and fail in contributing significantly to solution options and transformational change.