The role of the commission is advisory; in practice, the governme

The role of the commission is advisory; in practice, the government has always followed CFV’s recommendations, either immediately or after clarification of questions concerning implementation, organization, financing, and other issues. In Switzerland, new vaccines are registered and distributed at the request of pharmaceutical companies after marketing authorization is granted by Swissmedic. This marketing

authorization is independent of national recommendations that could be possibly made by CFV and FOPH. After an official recommendation has been made, the FDHA then makes a decision on integration of the vaccine on to the list of services reimbursed by health CHIR-99021 cell line insurance, after consultation has been made with the Commission fédérale des prestations générales (federal commission for general services). Currently there are several (new) vaccines available on the market that are not recommended

by the FOPH (rotavirus, herpes zoster), or vaccines that are only recommended and reimbursed for certain at-risk groups (hepatitis A). The FOPH also oversees social health insurance. This function of the FOPH sets reimbursement levels for pharmaceuticals, after consultation with the Commission fédérale des médicaments (federal commission for pharmaceutical products). This process involves comparing prices with those applied in neighboring countries, as well as negotiating prices with manufacturers. Cantonal authorities can also play a role, as they are responsible for implementation and they can conduct purchase-price negotiations for cantonal 3-deazaneplanocin A concentration programs. Occasionally, the effect of external, contextual influences can be significant, and the case of the HPV vaccine is a very good example of potential complexities that lie in the decision-making also process. In this instance, the HPV vaccine received heavy media coverage during its assessment by CFV, and between the time the CFV issued its recommendation to the public and implementation

of vaccination. The CFV wanted to make its recommendations public well before financing issues were settled by social health insurance because social health insurance was hesitant about moving forward, as it was trying unsuccessfully to negotiate a lower price for the vaccine. A solution was finally found whereby reimbursement was linked to the creation of cantonal programs including a central procurement of vaccines. However, this solution was communicated to the public before the cantons had the chance to set up such programs. This all resulted in creating a lot of public impatience and confusion, and in certain circles, there were suspicions of pressure from the pharmaceutical industry and conflicts of interest within the CFV. The Parliament intervened several times as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>