Ritzmann et al.43 suggested that an increase in muscle stiffness (and thus reflex response) in the muscles involved during jumping was due to the suppression of Ia afferent transmissions from muscle spindles

following vibration stimulus by the supraspinal centres. Ritzmann et al.43 discussed 3-MA solubility dmso the idea that vibration stimulus has been linked to suppression of Ia afferent pathways caused by pre activation.44 However, as the SSC is a combination of Ia afferent inputs and cortical contribution,45 the current results may suggest that an increase in cortical contribution (via supraspinal centres) compensates for a reduction in Ia afferent transmission. More importantly, for the current research this may explain the difference in improvements between Src inhibitor RSI and 505 agility time. Ritzmann et al.43 suggested that depending on the complexity of the motor task there was a greater cortical contribution and a reduction in Ia afferent recovery time. Therefore it could be argued that the motor complexity of the drop jump protocol

during the RSI protocol was greater than that of the 505 agility protocol and therefore benefited from this.43 Although positive results have been seen in 30 s WBV exposure16 in power and jump ability the relatively small exposure could be the reason for no increase in 505 agility as previously reported.30 An increase in vibration exposure may have improved these agility values. However, although not significant, a of negative trend in 505 agility was recognised. So any increase in exposure may have accelerated this worsening in performance due to fatigue.46 The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of acute vibration stimulus on a well-established warm-up routine (FIFA 11+). The results presented show that the addition of 30 s of vibration training immediately (<90 s) post FIFA 11+ had significant effect on CT and RSI, however no overall change

in DJH or 505 agility. This is the first study to combine the two interventions to test performance outcomes amongst soccer players and future research should investigate (1) the exact mechanism behind such improvements amongst different abilities as clear differences exist between trained and untrained athletes and responses to WBV,47 and (2) the time span of any improvements over the course of the athlete’s chosen activity to improve ecological validity. What is clear is that the neuromuscular response to acute vibration stimulus following a dynamic warm-up needs further investigation, in particular amongst a range of populations and performance outcomes. Much debate still surrounds the acute effects of WBV on subsequent performance enhancement. Amongst collegiate soccer players 30 s WBV at 40 Hz following FIFA 11+ improves RSI and has no negative effects on 505 agility.