Three trials reported double-blinding of patients and investigators by use of a placebo infusion.19, 25, 27 One trial was described as single-blind without specification of whether blinding referred to patients or investigators.16 The effect of blinding was not tested. Two trials used a two-crossover design.25, 27 One of these trials did not report mortality during the first treatment period.25 Three trials reported dropouts and withdrawals and included all patients in intention-to-treat analyses.17–19 The data from the trial Protease Inhibitor Library manufacturer published in abstract form
suggested that there were losses to follow-up, although this was not specifically stated.29 Remaining trials reported no losses to follow up. One trial followed patients to the end of treatment16 and one to liver transplantation or death.28 One trial followed patients to the end of treatment, but obtained additional follow-up data for some of the included patients.30 Four trials followed patients for 2 to 6 months after treatment.17–19, 29 One trial reported sample size calculations and achieved the required sample size.19 One trial was terminated prematurely due to unexpectedly low event rates.17 One trial was planned to include 20 patients and included 22 patients, but did not report sample size calculations.28 The trial published in abstract form includes 37 patients and is listed
as ongoing online with a planned sample size of 70 patients (www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00742690).29 Accordingly, the data from selleck chemicals the abstract may be an interim analysis, although this is not specifically stated. Abiraterone nmr Remaining trials did not report sample size calculations or whether trials were terminated early. Six of the seven trials on vasoconstrictor drugs alone or with albumin reported mortality.16–19, 26, 27 A meta-analysis of these trials revealed that vasoconstrictor drugs alone or with albumin reduced mortality (78/134 [58%] versus 99/134 [74%]; RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70–0.96; I2, 0%) (Fig. 2). Only four trials reported the number of patients with reversal of HRS or improvement of renal function (Fig. 3).16–19 All trials defined improved
renal function as ≥50% reduction in serum creatinine and compared terlipressin alone or with albumin versus no intervention or albumin. The trials found that vasoconstrictor drugs (terlipressin alone or with albumin) increased the proportion of patients with reversal of HRS (RR, 3.76; 95% CI, 2.21–6.39) or improved renal function (RR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.11–3.62). Four trials reported posttreatment serum creatinine in both treatment groups.16, 18, 26, 27 A meta-analysis of these trials revealed considerable intertrial heterogeneity (weighted mean difference, −128.29; 95% CI, −229.73 to −26.84; I2, 97%). Three trials17–19 reported the number of withdrawals due to adverse events (6/105 [6%] versus 0/105 [0%]; RR, 4.81; 95% CI, 0.84–27.56; I2, 0%).