9% 3482-4690 178 0.03 1296-2095 12 0.00 Rickettsia 97.2-100% 743-1275 92 0.49* 48-556 51 0.07 Shigella 97.4-99.7%

2781-3481 122 0.13 463-1185 -113 0.11 Staphylococcus 97.4-100% 1674-2653 72 0.41* 49-923 -18 0.02 Streptococcus 92.6-100% 929-1954 46 0.28* 84-1028 -35 0.15* Vibrio 90.9-99.8% 2345-3879 142 0.81* 396-2167 -21 0.03 Xanthomonas 99.8-100% 2802-3982 ND ND 201-1653 ND ND Yersinia 97.2-100% 2675-3825 347 0.94* 216-1319 -27 0.94* For each genus, the range of 16S rRNA gene percent identities for all pairs of isolates from that genus is listed. Under the “”shared proteins”" heading, “”range”" indicates the range of shared proteins in pairs of isolates from that genus. The “”slope”" column indicates the slope of the regression line when the number of shared selleck chemicals proteins in each pair of isolates is plotted against their 16S rRNA gene percent identities. The “”R 2″” column contains the square of the standard

correlation coefficient between these two variables, and indicates the strength of their relationship. The data under the “”average unique proteins”" heading are analogous to those under the “”shared proteins”" heading. Isolates sharing ≥ 99.5% identity of the 16S rRNA gene were not used in the calculation of slope or R 2. Values marked with “”ND”" were not determined; despite having different species names, all isolates with sequenced genomes within these genera shared ≥ 99.5% identity of the 16S rRNA gene. An asterisk (*) beside an R 2 value indicates that it is statistically significant with P-value < 0.05. In contrast to 16S rRNA gene percent Salubrinal cost identity, Table 2 shows that there is no specific range of proteomic diversity for a genus. In other words, although a reasonably consistent cutoff has traditionally been used for bounding the 16S rRNA gene identity of isolates from the same genus, there does not seem to be a corresponding lower limit for shared proteins or upper limit for average

unique proteins. Table 2 indicates that most genera exhibited a direct relationship between shared proteins and 16S rRNA gene percent identity, and an inverse relationship between average unique proteins and 16S rRNA gene percent identity. This was expected given that larger numbers isometheptene for the shared proteins measure indicate Enzalutamide purchase greater similarity, whereas larger numbers for the average unique proteins measure indicate greater dissimilarity. Interestingly, however, Neisseria exhibited the opposite trend; also anomalous were Rickettsia and Rhizobium, which had positive slopes for both proteomic similarity metrics. Surprisingly, the relationship between 16S rRNA gene similarity and protein content similarity was fairly weak for most genera. Specifically, only four of the 14 genera exhibited a strong (R 2 > 0.5) relationship between 16S rRNA gene identity and either of the proteomic similarity measures.