\n\nResults: A total of 230 children (31 with behavioral insomnia, 29 with feeding disorders, 170 controls) were enrolled. Their mean age was 16.1 +/- 7.6 months. Maternal cognitions/perceptions about sleep (maternal cognition infant sleep questionnaire, MCISQ) did not differ significantly between the behavioral insomnia

group and the feeding disorders group. The MCISQ score was significantly higher in the behavioral insomnia group compared with controls (P <.02). Mothers of children with feeding disorders reported being significantly more frustrated or anxious when they I-BET-762 supplier fed their child (P <.0005), less confident about their child getting enough food (P <.0005), and less confident NVP-LDE225 molecular weight in their ability to manage their child’s behavior at mealtime (P <.02) compared to the controls. Significant positive correlations were found between the MCISQ scores and the Beck Depression Inventory scores (r = 0.29, P <.0002), and between the MCISQ scores and the maternal cognitions of their child’s feeding scores

(r = 0.26, P <.0002). The latter remained significant after controlling for maternal depression (r = 0.25, P <.002).\n\nConclusions: Mothers of children with either behavioral insomnia or feeding disorders differ significantly from mothers of controls regarding their cognitions about sleep and feeding. Maternal cognitions about infant sleep behavior correlated with their cognitions about infant feeding. Maternal cognitions are a modifiable factor LY294002 that may serve as a target for intervention in both sleep and feeding disorders in children. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.”
“Purpose. Mathematical and simulation models are increasingly used to plan for and evaluate health sector responses to disasters, yet no clear consensus exists regarding best practices for the design, conduct, and reporting

of such models. The authors examined a large selection of published health sector disaster response models to generate a set of best practice guidelines for such models. Methods. The authors reviewed a spectrum of published disaster response models addressing public health or health care delivery, focusing in particular on the type of disaster and response decisions considered, decision makers targeted, choice of outcomes evaluated, modeling methodology, and reporting format. They developed initial recommendations for best practices for creating and reporting such models and refined these guidelines after soliciting feedback from response modeling experts and from members of the Society for Medical Decision Making. Results.