, 1999 and Konur and Yuste, 2004a), and spines can elongate and p

, 1999 and Konur and Yuste, 2004a), and spines can elongate and physically interact with nearby axonal terminals (Konur and Yuste, 2004b); see for example Movie 3 in Dunaevsky et al. (1999). This type of motility is exactly what one would expect to see if spines played an active role in connecting with passing axons. Another hint of this connectivity function can be found in the patterns in which spines are positioned

along some dendrites. In Purkinje cells, spines are arranged in helical patterns, positioned regularly along this website the dendrite with constant spacing and angular displacement between them (Figure 2; (O’Brien and Unwin, 2006). Helixes are a common structural design principle in nature (for example, in DNA, viral capsides, protein polymers, and leaf patterns on trees) and are an efficient strategy to systematically sample or fill a linear volume, because they maximize the distance in three dimensions between points (Nisoli et al., 2009). Spines could be arranged in helixes to minimize the number of spines used to sample a given volume of neuropil while maximizing their chances of contacting passing axons. The helical topology of spines would thus reduce the probability of connecting several spines from the same dendrite with the same axon. This would minimize “double-hits,” and increase the numbers of connections

with different axons, as if the circuit were selleck chemical trying to maximize the richness of inputs that each neuron receives and to completely fill the connectivity matrix. Consistent with this idea, geometrical arguments show that, by using spines, neurons increase their “potential connectivity,” i.e., the diversity of presynaptic partners (Chklovskii et al., 2002). These structural features, straight axons and helical spines, reveal a consistent logic of the connectivity

of spiny circuits. Excitatory axons distribute information to as many neurons as possible, and spiny neurons make contacts with as many different axons as possible. This creates a distributed topology, with large fan-out and fan-in factors, and could explain why the excitatory axons connect to spines, rather than to dendritic shafts: the circuit is CGK 733 trying to maximize the distribution and reception of information. For the cerebellar granule-Purkinje cells projection, this strategy may have been optimized to the physical limit, with the parallel fibers running at right angles to the Purkinje cell dendrites. Each granule cell may make just a single contact with each Purkinje cell, which may use helixes to perform this strategy as efficiently as possible (Palay and Chan-Palay, 1974 and Wen and Chklovskii, 2008). A similar strategy, although perhaps not so evident, might be present in cortical pyramidal neurons or striatal spiny cells (Wen et al., 2009).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>