229, p = 0.63), or outdoors (χ2 (1) = 1.177, p = 0.28). Similarly, age, gender, type
of surgery, type of fracture, and number of co-morbid medical conditions were not associated with inappropriate walking aid use at 6 months. Most participants Sunitinib mw (n = 82, 86%) were not aware of any goals set by the physiotherapist on discharge from the inpatient setting related to progression of their walking aid and ambulation. When goals were established and could be recalled by the participants they included such things as ‘aim to get onto a walking stick/four-wheeled walker as soon as possible’ (n = 5), ‘use the prescribed aid until safe to trial a walking stick indoors’ (n = 3), and ‘use until reviewed by the surgeon’ (n = 1). According to 89 (94%) participants a review time had not been set by the physiotherapist who prescribed the walking aid, and 58 (61%) were not aware of how long they should continue to use the prescribed walking aid. Of the 37 (39%) participants who stated that they were aware of how long they should use the prescribed aid, the most common responses were ‘assuming for life’ (n = 12) or ‘assuming DAPT concentration for 6 weeks/3 months because that is the length of the loan period’ (n = 11). For only 16 (17%) participants, the decision to change a walking aid was based on the recommendation of a physiotherapist. Many participants made the decision to change
the aid themselves, citing reasons such as ‘walking/ confidence has improved’ (n = 28), ‘doesn’t feel that the aid is required anymore’
(n = 7), ‘prefer one (walking aid) over another’ or ‘find one (walking aid) easier to use’ (n = 10). Others (n = 10, 11%) based their decision to change the aid on the recommendation of people other than physiotherapists, including a family member, a care worker 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase at a residential care facility, a community nurse, or an orthopaedic surgeon. The research physiotherapist reported that 25 (32%) of the 79 participants who changed their aid began using an inappropriate walking aid or using it incorrectly. Reasons for concern included that the aid was too high (n = 9) or too low (n = 2), that mobility was unsafe (n = 7), that the aid was being used incorrectly (in the wrong hand or the wrong way around, n = 3), and that the aid was inappropriate (n = 4: difficulty turning two-wheeled walker, antalgic gait leading to an increase in hip pain, push down brakes too difficult for patient to understand, use of a tray mobile instead of a walking aid). In this sample we found that a high proportion of hip fracture patients are discharged from hospital on a walking aid without a clear understanding of when to change aids and are not returning to their pre-morbid walking aid by six months after their fracture. There was a lack of walking aid review by a physiotherapist throughout this period and a high number of participants were making their own decisions about what walking aid was most appropriate for their use.