367, P = 0 001; r = 0 463, P = 0 000) Moreover, ptLVD was also p

Moreover, ptLVD was also positively correlated with lymph node metastasis(r = 0.354, P = 0.001). Figure 3 Prognosis analysis of vegf-c expression. Associations of Lymphangiogenesis with Clinicopathological Parameters in NSCLC Double immunostaining with podoplanin and Ki-67 was #MI-503 in vitro randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# performed for lymphogenesis analysis (Figure 4). Micro lymphatic vessels were brownish yellow after staining, while the nucleus of the proliferating endothelium cells of the micro lymphatic vessels appeared brownish red (indicated by the red arrow). Cancer embolus was detected in lymphatic vessels(Figure 4a). Figure

4 Double immunostaining with podoplanin and ki-67. The clinic significance was studied by analyzing the peritumoral and intratumoral lymphangiogenesis, various pathological parameters and follow-up data in 82 cases of NSCLC (Table 1). We divided LVD into high LVD CAL-101 supplier Group and low LVD Group according to median. Then the differences was analyzed one by one between ptLVD and itLVD in Age, Gender, Histologic type, Tumor differentiation, Pathologic N stage, Pathologic T stage, Blood vessel invasion (BVI), LVI, Pathologic stage, VEGF-C expression and Ki67%. The mean itLVD was 10.2. No difference was found in any

factors between Group high itLVD (n = 46) and Group low itLVD (n = 36) (P > 0.05 for all analyses). But ptLVD was different. The median ptLVD was 19.9. No difference was found in LVI, age, gender, the primary tumor size, histologic grade and Cediranib (AZD2171) histologic type between Group high ptLVD (n = 41) and Group low ptLVD

(n = 41) (P > 0.05). However, high ptLVD Group showed a significant increase than low ptLVD Group in several other clinicopathological parameters, such as lymph node metastasis, LVI, pathologic stage, VEGF-C and Ki67%. Namely, ptLVD was higher in stage III a patients than in stage I and II (P < 0.01), in LVI positive than in LVI negative (P = 0.004), in lymph node metastasis than in lymph node negative (P < 0.01), in VEGF-C positive than in VEGF-C negative (P < 0.01) in high Ki67% than in low Ki67%. ptLVD were associated significantly with a higher risk for developing LVI and lymph-node metastasis (P < 0.01). Table 1 Association of LVD and LVI with other clinicopathological parameters Clinicopathological Parameters Cases ptLVD itLVD LVI (-/+) Mean Survival Time (x ± s) median survival time Age (y)* ≧55 42 22.1 ± 8.9 10.1 ± 5.1 17/25 1567 ± 138 1658   <55 40 20.8 ± 7.9 11.2 ± 5.1 21/19 1856 ± 241 1864 Gender male 63 21.0 ± 7.9 11.2 ± 4.9 27/36 1795 ± 183 1658   female 19 23.2 ± 9.9 8.7 ± 5.5 11/8 1578 ± 214 1577 Histologic type Squamous cell 31 19.7 ± 6.4 9.6 ± 4.6 14/17 1664 ± 189 1972   Adenocarcinoma 41 22.4 ± 9.5 11.0 ± 5.1 20/21 1815 ± 231 1337   Large cell 10 23.4 ± 9.1 12.4 ± 6.1 4/6 1134 ± 156 1118 Tumor differentiation Well-moderate 44 21.3 ± 8.6 10.5 ± 5.4 20/24 2085 ± 220 1900   Poor 38 21.7 ± 8.3 10.8 ± 5.0 18/20 1325 ± 154 1118 Pathologic N stage N1–2 44 24.2 ± 8.9# 10.6 ± 5.

Comments are closed.