4–2.8). Some pharmacist participants saw the practice pharmacist position as an opportunity for role expansion to include repeat prescribing

and running disease management clinics, whilst others saw these roles as threats to integration as they may be perceived as professional boundary encroachment by GPs (Box 2.9–2.11). Participants agreed that the ideal practice pharmacist should be competent, knowledgeable and personable, being able to work both independently and as part of a team (Box 2.12). There were mixed views on the level of training pharmacists should receive prior to working in general practice. Most felt that clinical experience and additional, ongoing training would be essential (Box 2.13). The majority of participants thought a part-time or sessional position would be realistic for the practice pharmacist selleck chemical (Box 2.14). Most participants felt that the practice pharmacist should have full access to patient medical records and be bound by confidentiality requirements similar to other practice staff (Box 2.15). Most thought GP referral

to the pharmacist was needed, whereas others thought referrals could be made by other staff or by patients themselves (Box 2.16). Practice pharmacists could additionally assist with identifying suitable patients by screening records for those at risk of medication misadventure or with particular disease states (Box 2.17). Participants identified various funding options to remunerate the practice pharmacist, including selleckchem practice salary, patient co-payments, patient private health insurance, government funding (including existing and new Medicare Benefits Scheme (MBS)[18] items); or

combinations of these (Box 2.18–2.21). Participants felt that practice staff could benefit from more efficient communication, improved drug knowledge, sharing of care and clinical reassurance when managing complex patients. Optimised quality of prescribing, up-to-date medication records and reductions in workload for practice staff were other suggested benefits (Box 3.1–3.3). Patients prone to medication misadventure were felt to be able to potentially benefit from improved medication use and health outcomes (Box 3.4). Pharmacists would also benefit from an increased Tau-protein kinase scope of practice, greater integration into the primary healthcare team, credibility and professional satisfaction (Box 3.5–3.6). Some participants, however, thought the practice pharmacist would be unnecessarily duplicating GP services or increasing GP workload by wishing to engage GPs in case conferencing or other time-consuming activities (Box 3.7). Others perceived this new role as undermining the community pharmacist, potentially inciting competition or territorial issues and risking fragmentation of care (Box 3.8).