In the first fMRI study, we orthogonalized reward delivery to the task-relevant predictions about visual stimuli; additionally, we verified by

model comparison that our subjects’ decisions were unlikely to be driven by reward predictions. In our second fMRI study, we entirely omitted any reward, yet found exactly the same VTA/SN response to PEs about visual stimuli as in the first fMRI study (Figure 3). Beyond PEs about visual stimulus category, our hierarchical model also enabled us to examine higher-level PEs. Specifically, in both fMRI studies, we found a significant activation of the cholinergic basal forebrain by the precision-weighted PE ε3 about conditional probabilities selleck inhibitor (of the visual stimulus given the auditory cue) or, equivalently, cue-outcome contingencies. This finding provides a new perspective on possible computational roles of ACh. In the previous literature, the release of acetylcholine has

been associated with a diverse range of functions, including working memory (Hasselmo, 2006), attention (Demeter and Sarter, 2013), or learning (Dayan, 2012 and Doya, 2002). A recent influential proposal was that ACh levels may encode the degree of “expected uncertainty” (EU) (Yu and Dayan, 2002 and Yu and Dayan, 2005). Operationally, EU was defined (in Selleckchem Alectinib slightly different ways across articles) in reference to a hidden Markov model representing the relation between contextual states, cue validity, and sensory events. Notably, Yu and Dayan, 2002 and Yu and Dayan, 2005) implicitly defined EU as a high-level PE, in the sense that it represents the difference between a conditional probability (degree of cue validity) and certainty. Despite clear differences in

the underlying models, this definition is conceptually Substrate-level phosphorylation related to ε3 in our model (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures, section A, for details) that we found was encoded by activity in the basal forebrain. Our empirical findings thus complement the previous theoretical arguments by Yu and Dayan, 2002 and Yu and Dayan, 2005), offering a related perspective on ACh function by conceptualizing it as a precision-weighted PE about conditional probabilities (cue-outcome contingencies). The precision-weighting of this PE also relates our results on basal forebrain activation to the previous suggestion of a link between ACh and learning rate (Doya, 2002). This is because, in its numerator, ψ3 (the precision weight of ε3) contains an equivalent to a dynamic learning rate (Preuschoff and Bossaerts, 2007) for updating cue-outcome contingencies (see Equation A.10 in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures, section A and Equation 27 in Mathys et al., 2011). In summary, our findings are important in two ways. First, they provide empirical support for the importance of precision-weighted PEs as postulated by the Bayesian brain hypothesis.