The applicability of this approach was demonstrated long ago, by Frieden and Alberty (1955), but it faded into obscurity. Recently Beard et al. (2008) took up this suggestion and reanalysed the kinetics of citrate synthase (EC 2.3.3.1) in an exemplary manner, using data from various sources. However, even though this approach can be successful it is very time-consuming to collect all relevant data from published sources and it is doubtful whether the community will really profit from such work by using the rejuvenated data for further investigations.
Androgen Receptor high throughput screening Additionally, correction of calculated and published data can be considered a retrospective method. What about avoiding these correction requirements and generating prospective comparable data by adopting appropriate recommendations or standards? However, what does standardization mean, what kinds of standards are available? The basic idea of
standardized assays is to unify the experimental conditions when carrying out the experimental characterization of an identified enzyme. This can be equated with the use of a single, uniform and agreed methodology HKI-272 price and would lead to a set of protocols or experimental recipes that might be applicable for the study of enzymes in comparable cellular environments. In molecular Bumetanide biology protocols are not unusual, and are applied, for example, in procedures for heterologous expression of proteins in yeast using vectors made in Escherichia coli, etc. The hope is to significantly reduce the method-dependent between-laboratory variability of reported enzyme data when applying uniform methodologies for enzyme characterizations. In the field of applied enzymology clinical chemists were also
concerned with the difficulty to interpret enzyme-activity measurements in human serum due to the numerous analytical procedures for enzyme assays performed. This not only leads to uncertainties of the physicians to diagnose the patients with a clear vision of a disease and to decide for the correct therapy, but also complicates the transfer of clinical laboratory results from the literature to the daily medicinal treatment of the patients. Therefore, in the 1970s the Enzyme Commission of the Netherlands Society for Clinical Chemistry introduced recommended methods for the determination of the activity of a series of enzymes and subjected these uniform methods a test under the supervision of the Netherlands National External Quality Control Program.