The graphene sheet cannot make a complete recovery, and there exited broken covalent bonds after the unloading process. In the reloading process, the maximum force exerting on graphene is much smaller than that in Figure  3, which denotes the fracture of graphene lattices. Figure  4b describes the state where the unloading process begins, and Figure  4c describes the state where the unloading process ends. After the loading process, there exited broken bonds and fractured lattices in the middle of the graphene film and these defective structures did not recover during the unloading process.

Therefore, the deformation of the graphene described in this figure can be considered as a plastic type. Figure 4 Loading-unloading-reloading process with the maximum indentation depth smaller than the critical indentation depth. (a) Load–displacement curve, (b) local atom click here configuration when the loading process is finished, and OSI-906 in vitro (c) local atom configuration when the unloading process is finished. Young’s modulus and strength of the

graphene film According to the available correlation for the indentation experiments of a circular single-layer graphene film in [18, 22, 37], one new formula is constructed to describe the relationship between indention depth and load, (1) where d is the indentation depth and F denotes the concentrated force gotten by the graphene film. In Equation 1, the load F consists of two parts: the first part, F σ (d), represents the term due to the axial tension of the two-dimensional (2-D) film, (2) where σ 0 2D is the pre-tension of the single-layer graphene film, r

is the indenter radius, β denotes the aspect ratio and is equal to L/b, and R equ represents the equivalent radius of the rectangular graphene sheet, (Lb/π)1/2. RVX-208 The second one, F E(d), represents the large deformation term, (3) where E 2D is the 2-D elastic modulus, i.e., Young’s modulus, of the single layer graphene film. The strain energy density of graphene, as a standard 2-D material, can be represented by the energy of per unit area. Then, the corresponding pre-tension and elastic modulus can be expressed as σ 0 2D and E 2D, respectively, with the unit N/m. The common pre-tension and elastic modulus of a 3-D bulk material can be obtained through these 2-D ISRIB mw values divided respectively by the effective thickness which is always treated as the layer spacing of the graphite crystal, i.e., 3.35 Å. q is an nondimensional value, q = 1/(1.05 - 0.15ν - 0.16ν 2) = 0.9795, where ν denotes Poisson’s ratio, ν = 0.165 [3, 18, 21]. It is reported that when r/R > 0.1, the indenter radius has a significant influence on the load–displacement properties [38, 39]. In our simulations, r/R > 0.1; thus, Equations 2 and 3 are corrected by a factor of (r/R)3/4 and (r/R)1/4, respectively.