A three-dimensional model for MglA was constructed to identify residues that may be involved in protein-protein interactions Selleckchem CP-690550 and to examine ways in which MglA might deviate from other GTPases. While attempts to grow crystals with purified homogeneous MglA have not been successful, the homology between MglA and GTPases with previously derived crystal structure templates enabled us to model MglA using the SWISS-MODEL program [24–26]. The in silico structure of MglA was used to generate a 3-D molecular model that could be manipulated in PyMOL [27]. The predicted

structure of MglA based on the Sar1p protein from S. cerevisiae (PDB ID 2QTV chain B), is shown in Figure 1. Alignment of MglA with the template sequence Sar1p allows for all conserved motifs to be correctly aligned with those in MglA, preserving the PM1 and PM3 regions. Figure 1 A. In silico model of MglA with GPPNHP in the predicted active site; B. MglA model without docked nucleotide. A three-dimensional representation of MglA was constructed with SWISS-MODEL using the crystal structure of Sar1p

as a template [24–26] and the result is shown here as generated by PyMOL [27]. All mutations made in MglA were between residues 18 and 145. In both panels, buy CP673451 targeted residues are colored selleckchem as follows: P-loop (PM1), yellow; PM3, green; D52/T54, red; G2 motif, purple; leucine rich repeat (LRR), orange. Thr78 corresponds to the conserved aspartate residue characteristic of the Ras-superfamily, and is located at the end of the α-helix shown in green. Side-chains are shown for residues that were targets of study through site-directed mutagenesis.

A: A GTP analog was docked with MglA to identify residues Amisulpride in or near the active site that might directly interact with either the guanine base or the phosphates. B: The MglA apoenzyme is shown with residues indicated. G21 denotes the location of the PM1 region, the N114 residue shown is in the G2 motif. Both D52A and L124 are predicted surface residues on opposite faces of the protein. As the crystal structure of the Sar1p template lacks a portion of the N-terminus and begins with residue 23 of the predicted peptide, our MglA model also lacks a portion of the N-terminus and begins with Asn12. The Sar1p template likewise lacks a C-terminal portion of the protein, and the best alignment was made possible by a truncation of MglA as well. Hence, the MglA model ends with Lys185, which truncates ten residues of MglA. Using PyMOL’s alignment with least root mean square deviation (RMSD) of this model with the crystal structure of Sar1p containing GTP, we were able to determine the approximate position where GTP would bind to MglA. This is shown in Figure 1A as a space-filling molecule.