(Barns et al., 1991; Dujon et al., 2004; Dujon, 2006). Both S. cerevisiae and C. glabrata can produce biofilms as haploids (Whelan et al., 1984; Hawser & Douglas, 1994; Reynolds & Fink, 2001) ZD1839 and form a thin biofilm layer of budding yeasts (Seneviratne et al., 2009; Haagensen et al., 2011). Saccharomyces cerevisiae is genetically tractable and has several properties that make it a favoured model organism (Guthrie & Fink, 1991). Saccharomyces cerevisiae is rarely pathogenic (McCusker et al., 1994), has a high rate of homologous recombination and has a highly versatile DNA transformation system (Rothstein, 1983; Wach et al., 1994). Because of its use

in the food industry and as a cell biology model, it has been studied extensively. Saccharomyces cerevisiae was the first eukaryotic genome to be sequenced (Goffeau et al., 1996), making it amenable to global genetic and phenotypic analysis. In addition, both transcriptomic (DeRisi et al., 1997; Velculescu et al., 1997) and proteomic (Zhu et al., 2001) studies were first applied in S. cerevisiae. Consequently, advanced genetic tools have been developed for this fungus. Ten years ago, Reynolds

Pexidartinib and Fink introduced S. cerevisiae as a model for yeast biofilm studies (Reynolds & Fink, 2001). Biofilm formation of S. cerevisiae and its regulation are conserved in opportunistic pathogenic Candida spp. (Rigden et al., 2004; Desai et al., 2011). Hence, understanding of adherence and its regulation in S. cerevisiae contributes to our understanding of the orthologous mechanisms in Candida spp. Other properties of yeast biofilms may also be conserved, such as quorum sensing (QS) mechanisms (Chen et al., 2004; Chen & Fink, 2006) and the presence of an ECM (Hawser & Douglas, 1994; Kuthan et al., 2003). Taken together, these make S. cerevisiae an attractive model for biofilm studies. In this review, we focus on the traits common to bacterial

and pathogenic yeast biofilms that are also found in S. cerevisiae, specifically adhesion, ECM, QS, drug resistance and evolution of cell surface variation. The knowledge of molecular mechanisms for cell–cell and cell–surface adherence in S. cerevisiae is detailed Protein tyrosine phosphatase and well reviewed (Brückner & Mösch, 2011). As adhesion is essential for biofilm, environmental cues and pathways regulating adhesion are also expected to affect biofilm development. Because less is known about the molecular mechanisms for matrix formation, QS and drug resistance, the last part of the review contains a discussion of novel microscopic techniques and state-of-the-art molecular genetics that can be applied to identify and investigating factors for S. cerevisiae biofilm development. Attachment of S. cerevisiae to foreign surfaces such as polystyrene is dependent on the cell surface protein Muc1/Flo11 (Reynolds & Fink, 2001). In S.