Because many published studies do not clearly define or identify malnutrition and focus on cancer populations, they represent trials of nutrition vs malnutrition as much or more than they selleck products serve as trials of IN vs standard supplements. Perhaps the most widely

cited meta-analysis is that of Drover and colleagues in 2011.2 This study demonstrated reduced infectious complications with preoperative IN, but included trials with both isonitrogenous and standard diet controls without a subanalysis of these groups. The same year, Cerantola and colleagues published their own meta-analysis with similar results, including a reduction in infectious and noninfectious complications and LOS, also without any subanalysis of studies with different types of controls.38 Recently, 4 small trials of preoperative IN have not shown any benefit.15, 16, 21 and 22 Including some but not

all of the new trials, Osland and colleagues recently published their own meta-analysis.3 Like the others, their meta-analysis combined all trials examining preoperative supplementation regardless of the type of MK0683 clinical trial control used. This meta-analysis did, however, predate the larger Giger-Pabst and colleagues16 and Hübner and colleagues15 trials that were performed with isocaloric, isonitrogenous controls. Our meta-analysis attempts to reduce the heterogeneity of the preoperative IN literature by clearly identifying which studies use ONS controls vs those that use regular nonsupplemented diets. As with other meta-analyses in the nutrition literature, there are some inherent limitations. Even when standard ONS controls were used, the exact ingredients of these control formulas do vary from study to study. Trials with nonsupplemented regular oral diets were subject to the same variability. Many studies failed to record patient compliance with supplements

or total protein intake (both from supplements and regular diets). Most of the included studies used standard protocols with a typical length of supplementation of 5 days, but there was slight variation from study to study. Patients receiving preoperative supplementation in some trials might have received more monitoring in a nutrition support program resulting in improved outcomes.39 Although IN is typically eltoprazine defined as nutrition with supplemental arginine, fish oil, and antioxidants, most standard ONS contain these ingredients in some lower concentration. The ideal dose of these immunonutrients has not been defined and some standard ONS might contain therapeutic concentrations of these ingredients. Each study we included in our analysis was drawn from different patient populations undergoing various operations. Populations were randomized and controlled within each study, but were not consistent across all of the studies analyzed. We have used the random effects model approach to meta-analysis to address the presence of this heterogeneity.