Combining haemodynamic tests and imaging techniques best accomplish the investigation of these three aspects of the pathophysiology in CVI. The information obtained from ambulatory venous pressure and color duplex ultrasound is accurate DMXAA cell line when assessing reflux in the different segments of the different venous systems. The valve anatomic location and dynamic picture is supplied by descending phlebography. In case of venous obstruction, the haemodynamic tests lack accuracy and sensitivity. Therefore, imaging catheter techniques have to fill-in to depict vein morphology as well as inflow/outflow characteristics. The participation of several specialties in
the investigation of these patients widens the treatment possibilities by identifying those who may benefit from advanced surgical and/or endovascular procedures. This interventional-targeted approach should be a centralized function.”
“Purpose: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc; Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) allows fast delivery of stereotactic radiotherapy for Stage I lung tumors. We investigated discrepancies between
the calculated and delivered dose distributions, as well as the dosimetric impact of leaf interplay with breathing-induced tumor motion.\n\nMethods and Materials: In 20 consecutive patients with Stage I lung cancer who completed RapidArc delivery, 15 had tumor motion exceeding 5 mm Wnt inhibitor on four-dimensional computed tomography scan. Static and dynamic measurements were performed with Gafchromic EBT film (International Specialty Products Inc., Wayne, NJ) in a Quasar motion phantom (Modus Medical Devices, London, Ontario, Canada). Static measurements were compared with calculated dose distributions, and dynamic measurements were compared with the convolution of static measurements with sinusoidal motion patterns. Besides
clinical treatment plans, additional cases were optimized to create excessive multileaf collimator modulation and delivered on the phantom with peak-to-peak motions of up to selleck chemical 25 mm. gamma Analysis with a 3% dose difference and 2- or 1-mm distance to agreement was used to evaluate the accuracy of delivery and the dosimetric impact of the interplay effect.\n\nResults: In static mode film dosimetry of the two-arc delivery in the phantom showed that, on average, fewer than 3% of measurements had gamma greater than 1. Dynamic measurements of clinical plans showed a high degree of agreement with the convolutions: for double-arc plans, 99.5% met the gamma criterion. The degree of agreement was 98.5% for the plans with excessive multileaf collimator modulations and 25 mm of motion.\n\nConclusions: Film dosimetry shows that RapidArc accurately delivers the calculated dose distribution and that interplay between leaves and tumor motion is not significant for single-fraction treatments when RapidArc is delivered with two different arcs. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.