Fig. 2 summarizes the results from the three different methods used in our study by DENV serotype. None of our patients were infected with DENV-4. PRNT and most other neutralization assays have used epithelial cells, such as Vero or BHK-21 as host cells for DENV infection. These cells neither express FcγR nor are they the primary targets of DENV in vivo. Monocytes, on the other hand, play a central role in dengue virus replication ( Durbin et al., 2008 and Halstead, 1988) as well as the clearance of immune complexes. Using THP-1, which was derived from a patient with acute monocytic leukemia, we had observed that convalescent serum could only neutralize the homologous serotypes in the presence of FcγR-mediated phagocytosis
( Chan et al., 2011). Our present finding supports this hypothesis and demonstrates that such an approach find more could be used to determine the serotype of the infection. This approach CP-673451 mouse could be useful in assessing the efficacy of vaccination to each of the four DENV serotypes. As the tetravalent formulation of candidate dengue vaccines would elicit pan-dengue antibodies, clarifying whether these antibodies are able to neutralize each of the four DENV serotypes in the presence of FcγR phagocytosis,
similar to antibodies generated following an acute infection, could inform on whether vaccination is likely to result in long-term serotype-specific immunity. Our current findings also raise important questions. It is not evident why neutralization of heterologous serotypes could not occur in the presence of FcγR-mediated phagocytosis. It is possible that cross-reactive antibodies need higher of amounts of antibodies to fulfill the stoichiometric requirement for DENV neutralization compared to serotype-specific antibodies (Pierson et al., 2007) and these antibody concentrations coincide with that which aggregates DENV for FcγRIIB co-ligation (Chan et al., 2011). It is also possible that the cross-reactive antibodies to DENV antigens have lower binding
affinities that are compromised in the low pH environment within phagosomes. Indeed, serotype-specific antibodies appear to be more potent in DENV neutralization although cross-reactive antibodies were more abundant in convalescent sera (de Alwis et al., 2012). Hence, we suggest that in addition to blocking specific ligand-receptor interactions for viral entry, antibodies must prevent viral uncoating during FcγR-mediated phagocytosis for complete humoral protection. Clarifying this could be important for identifying suitable antibodies for therapeutic development (de Alwis et al., 2011, de Alwis et al., 2012 and Teoh et al., 2012). In conclusion, determining if virus neutralization occurs in the presence of FcγR-mediated phagocytosis can clarify the serotype of the DENV infection serologically. We thank our collaborators in the EDEN study for their assistance in patient enrolment and clinical specimen collections.