Four participants experienced adverse events during the experimental intervention and one participant experienced adverse events during the control intervention, which was not statistically
significant (RR = 4.00, 95% CI 0.47 to 33.86). The adverse events were Stem Cells inhibitor fatigue, breathlessness, and oxygen desaturation below 92%, all of which required interruption of the intervention but resolved swiftly. This randomised trial conducted in children with cystic fibrosis compared an exercise regimen with expiratory manoeuvres against a regimen of breathing and manual techniques for airway clearance. The primary outcome did not show significantly greater wet weight of sputum expectorated with one intervention or the other. However, the estimate of the mean difference had a confidence interval of –0.2 g to 1.4 g, which
is sufficiently precise to exclude the nominated smallest worthwhile effect of 1.5 g. Therefore we can conclude that the effects of the two interventions on sputum expectoration do not differ to a clinically important extent. This is an important finding because it indicates that one intervention or the other may be chosen based on, eg, its effects on other outcomes or acceptability to the child with cystic fibrosis. In the analyses of lung function in this study, exercise tended to have the better effect of the two selleck products interventions. Although no smallest worthwhile effect was nominated for FEV1, the lower limit of the confidence Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase interval was clearly clinically trivial,
while the upper limit is arguably a clinically worthwhile difference to achieve with a single application of the intervention. This suggests that children who prefer to achieve airway clearance through exercise would not do so at the expense of their lung function. This result is consistent with the study by Bilton et al (1992), in which FEV1 improved within 20 min of exercise. However, an important caveat here is that the long-term effects of these interventions may not be a simple extrapolation of their effects after a single treatment. Nevertheless, if the effect does persist, this may explain how short-term training programs increase pulmonary function (Selvadurai et al 2002) and long-term programs protect against lung function decline (Schneiderman-Walker et al 2000). The acceptability of an airway clearance intervention to children with cystic fibrosis is an important consideration because they are recommended to perform airway clearance regularly on an ongoing basis (Lester et al 2009, Schechter 2007). If adherence is to be maintained with this indefinite prescription to perform airway clearance, the acceptability of the clearance regimen is crucial.