Habituation to the fear conditioning

chambers (TSE Systems Inc., USA) was carried out for Crizotinib ic50 15 mins for 4 days before training. The training phase consisted of a 2 min pause, and 6 repeats of 30 s tone with a 0.8 mA shock presented in the last 2 s of the 30 s tone. During the test phase 24 h later, the tone was sounded for 30 s without the shock. The time spent in freezing was recorded for 5 min following the tone. Freezing was detected by an array of infrared light beam sensors mounted 14 mm apart to monitor the position and movement of the animal inside the chamber (TSE Systems Inc., USA). All recordings were done via the TSE Systems software. This programme uses an averaging procedure to define the centre of gravity of the rat. An instance of freezing was defined as the animal not moving for more than a threshold duration of 5 s. Percentage freezing was calculated as the cumulative duration of freezing as a percentage of total time. RT-PCR gel and western blot images were analysed with ImageJ. The density

of each band was measured and normalised to its corresponding actin band (RT-PCR: ABT-199 in vitro n=4 each for sham and NI-lesioned; western blot: n=3 for naïve, n=3 for saline, n=3 for true sham, n=6 for sham-lesioned and n=7 for NI-lesioned). The densitometry data was statistically analysed with unpaired t tests (GraphPad Prism, USA) comparing sham-lesioned and NI-lesioned groups for each protein. For the real-time PCR (n=4 each for sham and NI-lesioned), the amplified transcripts were quantified using the comparative CT method ( Livak and Schmittgen, 2001), with the formula for relative fold change=2–ΔΔCT. The means were analysed with unpaired t tests (GraphPad Prism, USA). Freezing behaviour (threshold set at 3 s) of the sham-lesioned (10) and NI-lesioned (n=8)

rats was recorded in 30 s epochs for a total of 5 min. Total percentage freezing time was calculated and analysed with an unpaired t test (GraphPad Prism, USA). The data were expressed as mean±SEM. This work was funded by the Biomedical Research Council (07/1/21/19/512 and 10/1/21/19/645) and the National Medical Research buy ZD1839 Council (IRG10Nov104), Singapore. The authors wish to thank Ms. Lim Zhining for executing pilot studies; Ms. Hong Jia Mei and Dr. Tan Chee Kuan, Francis, for expert technical advice and support; and Mr. Ho Woon Fei for excellent technical and administrative assistance. “
“Important mechanisms for the control of sodium and water intake are present in the lateral parabrachial nucleus (LPBN), a pontine structure located dorsolaterally to the superior cerebellar peduncle (Andrade et al., 2006, Callera et al., 2005, De Luca et al., 2003, De Oliveira et al., 2007, Menani et al., 2002 and Menani and Johnson, 1995).