Results:

Groups differed significantly in the following a

Results:

Groups differed significantly in the following aspects: age at onset of disease (TR: 15.6, G: 10.8 years; P – 0.02), delay between onset and initiation of colchicine treatment (TR: 6.8 years, G: 14.9 years; P < 0.001), female gender (TR: 80%, G: 57.1%; P = 0.04), and duration of disease (TR: 14.4 years, G: 23.4 years; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in colchicine treatment concerning average dosing and duration of therapy. No significant difference could be found between the 2 groups in CRP and disease severity as assessed by the score of Pras et al. (Am J Med Genet. 1998; 75: 216-219) even after adjusting for potential confounding MCC950 research buy variables. Mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate was significantly higher among patients living in G (TR: 13.2 mm/first hour, G: 26.3 mm/first hour; P < 0.001). Among patients living in Germany, there was a significant difference in

age at FMF onset depending on their country of birth (born in TR: 14.9 years, born in G: 6.9 years; P = 0.0001).

Conclusions: In adult FMF patients living in Turkey or Germany, no difference in disease activity or CRP could be found. German patients were younger at onset of disease and had a longer delay between onset and initiation of colchicine treatment.”
“Background: Many studies have investigated racial/ethnic disparities in medication non-adherence Protein Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor in patients with type 2 diabetes using common measures such as medication possession ratio (MPR) or gaps between refills. All these measures including MPR selleck are quasi-continuous and bounded and their distribution is usually skewed. Analysis of such measures using traditional regression methods that model mean changes in the dependent variable may fail to provide a full picture about differential patterns in non-adherence between groups.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of 11,272 veterans with type 2 diabetes was assembled from Veterans Administration datasets from April 1996 to May 2006. The main outcome measure was MPR with quantile cutoffs Q1-Q4 taking values of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 0.9. Quantile-regression (QReg) was used to model the association between MPR and

race/ethnicity after adjusting for covariates. Comparison was made with commonly used ordinary-least-squares (OLS) and generalized linear mixed models (GLMM).

Results: Quantile-regression showed that Non-Hispanic-Black (NHB) had statistically significantly lower MPR compared to Non-Hispanic-White (NHW) holding all other variables constant across all quantiles with estimates and p-values given as -3.4% (p = 0.11), -5.4% (p = 0.01), -3.1% (p = 0.001), and -2.00% (p = 0.001) for Q1 to Q4, respectively. Other racial/ethnic groups had lower adherence than NHW only in the lowest quantile (Q1) of about -6.3% (p = 0.003). In contrast, OLS and GLMM only showed differences in mean MPR between NHB and NHW while the mean MPR difference between other racial groups and NHW was not significant.

Comments are closed.