Table 2 Distribution of the reasons to entry the ED recorded by using ICPC 2 classification in group E patients (N = 1244) of the Espoo EDs Discussion The implementation

of the ABCDE-triage combined with public guidance was associated with reduction in the number of patient visits to GP out-of-hours ED services by about 24%. The observed #this website keyword# reduction in GP visits in the ED may partly be due to considerable public debate and the publicity provided by the new system and rules. It is possible that some of the patients decided not to request emergency care at all due to the expected long waiting times or risk of being redirected to daytime health services. Patients were Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical also assessed to group E by the triage nurse and redirected to homecare. This result is higher than our former experience from Vantaa City where the number of ED visits decreased by 8% after implementation of ABCDE-triage [16]. In Espoo, the population seemed to adapt very quickly to the idea that those who needed help most must go first and those whose

need is not urgent should not necessarily visit the ED at all. However, a considerable difference between Vantaa and Espoo was, that in Espoo the patient who was assessed to group E might be sent home with advice Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical while in Vantaa the patient was allowed to stay and wait as long as the queue of more urgent patients (groups A-D) persisted [16]. This may also have explained why the decrease in patient visits was much higher in Espoo than in Vantaa. GPs were previously assumed to regulate access to the acute secondary health care by referring those patients who need specialist Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical care. The triage was performed by primary health care in EDs but it did not diminish or increase the workload of the secondary health care in the same facility. Altogether, the present finding agrees with the former Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical report of Vertesi [3] which suggested that triage did not automatically enhance activities in the secondary health care ED. The number of visits to primary care GPs during office hours was unchanged from March 2004

to February 2008 in Espoo (Figure ​(Figure3).3). Thus, the decrease in patient visits to the GPs in Espoo EDs did not cause an overflow of patients in the office hour GP practice. There were some hints that demand for nurse visits in daytime services increased but this could not be verified because also other changes were made in office-hour Bay 11-7085 public health to alter the workload of nurses at the same time. Furthermore, no excessive doctor resources were allocated to office-hour activities at the time of the intervention. Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that the lack of change in the number of visits to primary care GPs during office hours was just attributable to that fact. Yet the same phenomenon was observed in Vantaa City in our previous work [16].