This efficacy was found to be independent of baseline risk factors [11] and to be maintained over 5 years against placebo
[12] with a good safety profile. Results of a pooled extension study of the SOTI and TROPOS populations to 8 years [13] E7080 manufacturer suggested the maintenance of the antifracture efficacy over 8 years of continuous treatment with strontium ranelate. In this article, we describe the results of a pooled longer-term open-label extension of the SOTI and TROPOS studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate up CP673451 datasheet to 10 years. Methods Study design and patients The procedures for the open-label extension study of SOTI and TROPOS have been described extensively elsewhere
[13]. The initial 3-year extension (8 years’ continuous treatment) was increased by 2 years to reach a total of 10 years’ continuous follow-up. The 10-year extension study therefore enrolled postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who had completed 5 years of treatment with strontium ranelate or placebo in the SOTI and TROPOS studies (years 0 to 5) plus a further 5 years of treatment in the extension phase (years 6 to 10) [9, 10] (Fig. 1). The main reasons for not continuing were either patient’s own personal decision or investigator’s decision according to the patient’s status (e.g. age or mobility). During the open-label extension, all patients received strontium ranelate Ketotifen Selleckchem ON-01910 2 g/day, as well as calcium (< 1000 mg/day) and vitamin D (400 to 800 IU/day). All patients gave written informed consent before inclusion in both parts of the extension study (at year 6 and year 9), which was approved by institutional
ethics review committees. In this article, results will be restricted to the 10-year population (n = 237), i.e. patients from the active treatment arms of SOTI and TROPOS who received strontium ranelate for up to 10 years. Fig. 1 Flow of patients Efficacy endpoints The main efficacy endpoints were the incidence of new osteoporotic fractures and the change in lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip BMD between years 6 and 10. The procedures used to evaluate the incidence of fractures are described in detail in the original reports [9, 10, 13]. All patients from the SOTI trial had spinal X-rays at inclusion and yearly thereafter. The patients from the TROPOS study in whom spinal X-rays were routinely performed continued to have them in the extension phase. Spinal X-rays were read centrally and incident vertebral fracture detected by semi-quantitative assessment and grading [14].