Even though the sole interaction of CbpM which came out from the

Even though the sole interaction of CbpM which came out from the screen procedure was with CRP, confirmed in the dose-response analysis, this more detailed characterization allows to propose that CbpM interacts with elastin but Temsirolimus too weakly to be considered as positive during the screen procedure (Fig 4). All together these results validate the procedure that we used to select the interactions that emerge from the screen. Figure 4 Dose

dependent binding of chosen Cbps to CRP, elastin and collagens. Increasing concentrations of His-Tagged Cbps (from 0,8 to 200 pmole) have been bound to 1 μg of BSA as a control, CRP, collagens and elastin. The quantity of bound protein is detected in a luminometer using an HRP JNJ-26481585 chemical structure conjugated antibody directed against the His-Tag. Discussion We have presented an experimental set up that allowed the analysis of the binding properties of 19 surface-exposed pneumococcal proteins, leading to the screen of more than 200 interactions, most of which have never been reported in the literature before. The validity of this approach is strengthened by the fact that known interactions were « rediscovered ». For example, we confirmed the interaction between CbpA and Factor

H [40]. Complementary ELISA analysis gave a confirmation of the validity of our procedure on chosen protein-protein interactions. From this screen, we https://www.selleckchem.com/products/prt062607-p505-15-hcl.html conclude that whereas LPXTG proteins do not appear to be major adhesins, Cbps seem to be more important players in the adhesion processes. One explanation can be that most of the Cbps are not associated with enzymatic functions (except the Lyt proteins, CbpD, CbpE and CbpG, see Fig 2). Probably the main function of

the Cbps (except for the Lyt proteins) resides in the host-pathogen interaction, and adhesion processes. Most of the LPXTG proteins do exhibit complex ‘multi’-functions (enzymatic Calpain domains plus different binding domains, see Fig 3), rendering plausible the hypothesis that they have more diverse functions at the surface of the bacteria. Indeed, the results obtained tend to minimize their roles in the adhesion processes. However one has to keep in mind that often only part of the LPXTG proteins was tested as they are usually larger proteins than the Cbps. It’s possible that this bias led us to miss significant interactions. Another point is that only protein-protein interactions were tested during the course of the screen. Yet carbohydrates are important components of the host, they were not included in that study and could be an important target of the LPXTG proteins, in particular for the ones that bear carbohydrate-binding modules as it was recently proven for SpuA [41]. Finally, this screen addressed a small fraction of host factors potentially involved in the interactions with the pneumococcus.

Comments are closed.