The concentrations of PGE 2 used reflect the optimal in-vitro con

The concentrations of PGE 2 used reflect the optimal in-vitro concentration to induce cellular responses as noted in a number of studies [11–14]. RNA extraction and real time PCR were performed as described above. Statistics All analyses were performed independently in triplicate. Students paired t-test was used to compare groups with a P value < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results The effect of Myeov gene knockdown on CRC cell migration In order to establish the role of Myeov in colorectal cancer cell migration we performed targeted knockdown using siRNA. A T84 cell line MM-102 price model

of colorectal cancer was used. Successful knockdown of Myeov mRNA expression in T84 cells using siRNA was confirmed using quantitative real time PCR (Figure 1A). A 74% reduction in Myeov mRNA expression was observed in knockdown cells in comparison with control cells 48 hr post transfection (P < 0.05). In order to investigate the effect of Myeov depletion on check details T84 colorectal cancer cell migration, scratch wound healing assays were performed. Myeov knockdown resulted in decreased T84 colorectal cancer cell migration.

Myeov knockdown resulted in a 25%, 41%, and 39% reduction in T84 colorectal cancer cell migration was observed at 12, 24 and 36 hrs CH5424802 nmr respectively compared to control cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 1C). Figure 1 (A) Confirmation of Myeov knockdown. Myeov mRNA expression in control and siRNA treated cells was quantitated using Etomidate real time PCR. (* = p < 0.05). (B) Representative images of the wound healing scratch assay. The lines represent measurements made to assess reduction in ""scratch"" width as a marker of migration. (C) Effect of Myeov knockdown on cell migration over time (* P < 0.05. ** P < 0.01). The effect of PGE2 on Myeov expression In order to investigate the effect of PGE 2 on Myeov gene expression in colorectal cancer, T84 colorectal cancer cells were treated with varying doses of PGE 2 for varying times in vitro and Myeov

mRNA expression was monitored using quantitative real time PCR. Treatment of T84 cells with PGE 2 for 24 hr resulted in increased Myeov expression however the maximum effect occurred at 60 mins (Figure 2A &2B). Furthermore this effect was dose-dependent. At 60 mins, 0.00025 μ M PGE 2 increased Myeov gene expression by 289%, 0.1 μM PGE 2 increased Myeov expression by 547% and 1.0 μM PGE 2 increased Myeov expression by 961% (P < 0.05). Treatment with PGE 2 for 30 min resulted in decreased Myeov expression with 1.0 μM treatment having a significant inhibitory effect, decreasing Myeov expression by 99% (P < 0.01) (Figure 2B). Figure 2 The effect of PGE 2 on Myeov expression. (A) The % change in Myeov expression in T84 CRC cells treated with increasing doses of PGE 2 at 60 mins in comparison with untreated cells (* = P < 0.05). (B) The time dependent effect of PGE 2 on Myeov expression. T84 CRC cells were treated with 1 μM PGE 2 and Myeov expression was assessed at various time points.

Comments are closed.