Consider withholding dialysis if a patient over 75 years of age has two or more of the following: Nephrologist response to the Surprise Question of ‘No, I would not be surprised if my patient died within the next 12 months’. High comorbidity score (e.g. MCS ≥ 8). Marked functional
impairment (e.g. Karnofsky performance status score < 40). Severe chronic malnutrition (serum albumin < 25 g/L Ivacaftor using the bromcresol green method). This guideline will review the current prediction models and survival/mortality scores available for decision-making in patients with advanced kidney disease who are being considered for a non-dialysis treatment pathway. Risk prediction is gaining increasing attention with emerging
literature suggesting improved patient outcomes through individualized risk prediction.[1] Predictive models help inform the nephrologist and the renal palliative care specialists in their discussions with patients and families about suitability or otherwise of dialysis. Clinical decision-making in the care of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on a non-dialysis treatment pathway is currently governed by several observational trials.[2] Despite the paucity of evidence-based medicine in this field, it is becoming evident that the survival advantages associated with renal replacement therapy in these often elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and limited functional status may be negated by loss of quality of life,[3, 4] further functional decline,[5, 6] increased complications CX-4945 and hospitalizations. Here we review the pertinent predictive models and risk calculators for ESKD and highlight the advantages and disadvantages associated with
each. It is important to recognize that there is currently no consensus for conducting or reporting the development and validation of multivariate prediction models. Prediction models for chronic kidney were often developed using inappropriate methods and were generally poorly Rucaparib in vivo reported.[7] A ‘c-statistic’ is a measurement of how well the model predicts the event. A c-statistic of 0.5 = no better than chance; a c-statistic of 1.0 = perfect prediction and is acceptable if ≥0.7. Models considered to be well reported include the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Tangri et al. model.[1] The patient population in which the score was developed should be taken into account. Decision-making for ESKD patients are currently being guided by existing mortality prediction models developed and validated in dialysis patients.[5, 8, 9] When considering treatment choices it is important to consider the following facts. There are around 800 kidney transplant operations performed annually. As at 4 January 2012 there were 1135 people waiting for a kidney transplant in Australia, which represents approximately 11% of the people receiving dialysis.